Like many things in the world, court depositions have become virtual as a result of the pandemic. As we know, Zoom and other virtual platforms have a steep learning curve so using them for depositions takes extra precaution and planning.
Demands for insurance policy limits frequently generate substantial concern for insurers. A properly executed policy limits demand that is rejected by an insurer will “open the policy” and expose the insurer to liability in excess of its policy limits. The
Carmel & Naccasha LLP attorneys recently facilitated the integration of a highly regarded employee benefits agency and brokerage on the Central Coast with the strength and resources of a leading global insurance brokerage. Here’s what the owner of the agency
On August 18, 2011, a decision came down from the California Supreme Court in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, No. S179115. This decision set a limit on the defendant’s liability for special medical damages and the amounts recoverable by
Pssst! I have a “secret” for you… well, it’s not exactly a secret, but it is a winning device that is underutilized in California – the Evidence Code 402 motion. All attorneys and claims professionals are familiar with Motions for
It is not likely a “news flash” to most trial attorneys; but, I’ll restate it anyway… construction defect litigation is “complex litigation”. There are two reasons for that… the first is because of the numbers of parties typically involved, the
Like many things in the world, court depositions have become virtual as a result of the pandemic. As we know, Zoom and other virtual platforms have a steep learning curve so using them for depositions takes extra precaution and planning.
Demands for insurance policy limits frequently generate substantial concern for insurers. A properly executed policy limits demand that is rejected by an insurer will “open the policy” and expose the insurer to liability in excess of its policy limits. The
Carmel & Naccasha LLP attorneys recently facilitated the integration of a highly regarded employee benefits agency and brokerage on the Central Coast with the strength and resources of a leading global insurance brokerage. Here’s what the owner of the agency
On August 18, 2011, a decision came down from the California Supreme Court in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, No. S179115. This decision set a limit on the defendant’s liability for special medical damages and the amounts recoverable by
Pssst! I have a “secret” for you… well, it’s not exactly a secret, but it is a winning device that is underutilized in California – the Evidence Code 402 motion. All attorneys and claims professionals are familiar with Motions for
It is not likely a “news flash” to most trial attorneys; but, I’ll restate it anyway… construction defect litigation is “complex litigation”. There are two reasons for that… the first is because of the numbers of parties typically involved, the
Recent Posts